Quoting glibc rand(3):

The  versions  of rand() and srand() in the Linux C Library use the same random
number generator as random(3) and srandom(3), so the lower-order bits should be
as  random  as  the  higher-order bits.   However,  on  older  rand()
implementations, and on current implementations on different systems, the
lower-order bits are much less random than the higher-order bits.  Do not use
this function in applications intended to be portable when good randomness is
needed.  (Use random(3) instead.)

Closes: #124

Partial fix of: #310

Fixes: #415

Trying to handle stdin when select() in fact returned an error due to being
interrupted by a signal is a rather bad idea.

See issue #405

See issue #405

See issue #405

Closes #400

Closes #279

Addresses part of issue #75

This restores pre-2.21 ~/.fehbg behaviour. Replicating the entire commandline
in ~/.fehbg turned out to do more harm than good.

Closes #398